Analysts warn: Bitcoin annual cycle is becoming less important – Institutional investments and macroeconomic forces are increasingly determining the BTC price

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

The Bitcoin market in transition: The end of the 4-year cycle? There is often debate in the cryptocurrency world about Bitcoin's 4-year cycle, which has traditionally been associated with Bitcoin halvings and accompanying price movements. But recent analysis suggests that this cycle is becoming less relevant. One of the key reasons for this is the increasing institutional investments, which have a significant impact on the Bitcoin price. More companies and institutional investors are including Bitcoin as part of their investment strategy, which could lead to increased price stability and less volatility. This could suggest that seasonal trends and historical price movements have less influence on the...

Der Bitcoin-Markt im Wandel: Das Ende des 4-Jahres-Zyklus? In der Welt der Kryptowährungen wird oft über den 4-Jahres-Zyklus von Bitcoin diskutiert, der traditionell mit Bitcoin-Halvings und damit einhergehenden Preisbewegungen in Verbindung gebracht wurde. Doch jüngste Analysen deuten darauf hin, dass dieser Zyklus an Relevanz verliert. Einer der zentralen Gründe dafür sind die steigenden institutionellen Investitionen, die einen signifikanten Einfluss auf den Bitcoin-Preis haben. Immer mehr Unternehmen und institutionelle Anleger nehmen Bitcoin als Teil ihrer Anlagestrategie auf, was zu einer erhöhten Preisstabilität und weniger Volatilität führen könnte. Dies könnte darauf hindeuten, dass saisonale Trends und historische Preisbewegungen weniger Einfluss auf die …
The Bitcoin market in transition: The end of the 4-year cycle? There is often debate in the cryptocurrency world about Bitcoin's 4-year cycle, which has traditionally been associated with Bitcoin halvings and accompanying price movements. But recent analysis suggests that this cycle is becoming less relevant. One of the key reasons for this is the increasing institutional investments, which have a significant impact on the Bitcoin price. More companies and institutional investors are including Bitcoin as part of their investment strategy, which could lead to increased price stability and less volatility. This could suggest that seasonal trends and historical price movements have less influence on the...

Analysts warn: Bitcoin annual cycle is becoming less important – Institutional investments and macroeconomic forces are increasingly determining the BTC price

The Bitcoin market in transition: The end of the 4-year cycle?

There is often debate in the cryptocurrency world about Bitcoin's 4-year cycle, which has traditionally been associated with Bitcoin halvings and accompanying price movements. But recent analysis suggests that this cycle is becoming less relevant.

One of the key reasons for this is the increasing institutional investments, which have a significant impact on the Bitcoin price. More companies and institutional investors are including Bitcoin as part of their investment strategy, which could lead to increased price stability and less volatility. This could indicate that seasonal trends and historical price movements are having less influence on market movements than they used to.

In addition, activity in the area of ​​exchange-traded funds (ETFs) plays a crucial role. The approval and launch of various Bitcoin ETFs allows a wider investor base to invest in Bitcoin, which in turn can drive demand and therefore price. These developments suggest that Bitcoin market mechanisms have become more dynamic and less predictable.

Another important factor is macroeconomic influences. Global economic trends and central bank decisions are increasingly influencing the crypto market. Interest rate changes, inflation and crises in other asset classes can determine the direction of the Bitcoin price and make the original 4-year cycle less relevant.

Overall, the analysis shows that various dynamic factors, such as institutional inflows, ETF activity and macroeconomic trends, are increasingly shaping the Bitcoin market. The 4-year cycle, which once played a significant role, may become less important in this changing environment. Market participants must therefore adapt to a new reality in which traditional patterns may no longer apply.