Defillama apologizes for internal conflict to start Llama token

Das dezentrale Finanzanalyseunternehmen DeFiLlama entschuldigte sich für den internen Konflikt, der sich am Wochenende zusammengebraut hatte. In einem auf Twitter geteilten Update zitierte das Team „schlechte Kommunikation und ein Missverständnis“. Das Drama dreht sich um einen einheimischen LLAMA-Token. Das Team bestätigte jedoch, dass es keine Pläne gibt, das derzeit geplante Token auf den Markt zu bringen, und jeder Airdrop wird mit der Community besprochen, während gleichzeitig versichert wird, dass die notwendigen Schritte unternommen werden, um „auf transparentere Weise zu arbeiten, um sicherzustellen, dass dies nicht geschieht nochmal.“ Das Drama Alles begann mit einer Kluft zwischen pseudonymen Mitbegründern – 0xLlam4 und …
The decentralized financial analysis company Defillama apologized for the internal conflict that had brewed at the weekend. In an update divided on Twitter, the team quoted "bad communication and a misunderstanding". The drama revolves around a local Llama token. However, the team confirmed that there are no plans to launch the currently planned token, and every airdrop is discussed with the community, while at the same time it is assured that the necessary steps are taken to "work more transparently to ensure that this does not happen again." The drama all started with a gap between pseudonyms - 0xllam4 and ... (Symbolbild/KNAT)

Defillama apologizes for internal conflict to start Llama token

The decentralized financial analysis company Defillama apologized for the internal conflict that had brewed together at the weekend. In an update divided on Twitter, the team quoted "bad communication and a misunderstanding". The drama revolves around a local Llama token.

However, the team confirmed that there are no plans to launch the currently planned token, and every airdro is discussed with the community, while at the same time it is assured that the necessary steps are taken to "work more transparently to ensure that this does not happen again."

the drama

It all started with a gap between pseudonyms - 0xllam4 and 0xngmi - due to the lack of income from the project. As explained by a pseudonymen defillama employee, "tendeno" wanted 0xllam4 Bring a token from the Defillama brand onto the market, but planned to do this "with or without the consent of a single member of the team". Although this claim was refuted by 0xllam4, they did not provide any further explanation.

The Defillama team, on the other hand, has always been against the introduction of a token. For example, Tendeno said that such a start would "stain" the call of the project. In particular, 0xllam4 also controls the defillama Twitter account and the domain. This triggered concerns that they essentially announce a token at any time and "essentially keep the team as hostage".

0xngmi also confirmed the same. The co-founder claimed that Defillama was adopted in an enemy way and the people in a split version the blockchain data platform referred to Twitter. Less than an hour after the first tweet, a message claimed in one of the project's telegram channels that 0xngmi had "become renegade".

resolution

A day later, 0xngmi said that "everything was solved" and added that the fork was broken off while planning to continue all work on Defillama.

signature check https://t.co/4cvfncoovb

-0xngmi (Lamzip-Bogen) (@0xngmi) 19. March 2023

In the meantime, tendeno also confirmed the same and ,

"After a long back and forth, the team solved the problems internally and decided to continue DL as usual. The team wants to continue and do not continue the conversation in public, but be assured that everyone at DL is satisfied with the result."

.