Uniswap under fire: Community criticizes non-transparent decision over $ 165.5 million for Unicain and misses governance transparency

Veröffentlicht:

Von:

Kritik an Uniswap: Governance-Probleme und der kontroverse Unichain-Start Uniswap, eine der führenden Plattformen im dezentralen Finanzwesen (DeFi), steht aufgrund der Einführung von Unichain, einem neuen Layer-2-Netzwerk, unter starkem Beschuss aus der Community. Mitglieder der Uniswap-Governance kritisieren diesen Schritt als intransparent und als potenzielle Bedrohung für die Governance des Netzwerks. Insbesondere sorgt die Zuteilung von 165,5 Millionen Dollar für die Entwicklung von Unichain und Liquiditätsanreize für Unmut unter den UNI-Token-Inhabern. Unzufriedenheit der UNI-Token-Inhaber Die Frustration unter den UNI-Token-Inhabern ist groß. Sie weisen darauf hin, dass die zentralisierte Einnahmestrategie von Uniswap für sie nachteilig ist. In den letzten zwei Jahren hat Uniswap …
Criticism of uniswap: governance problems and the controversial unicain start uniswap, one of the leading platforms in decentralized finance (Defi), is due to the introduction of Unicain, a new Layer-2 network, under a strong fire from the community. Members of the Uniswap Governance criticize this step as non-transparent and as a potential threat to the governance's governance. In particular, the allocation of $ 165.5 million ensures the development of Unicain and liquidity incentives for resentment among university token owners. Dissatisfaction of the university token owners The frustration among university token owners is great. They point out that the centralized revenue strategy from Uniswap is disadvantageous for them. In the past two years, uniswap ... (Symbolbild/KNAT)

Criticism of uniswap: governance problems and the controversy unicain start

uniswap, one of the leading platforms in decentralized finance (Defi), is under strong fire from the community due to the introduction of Unicer, a new Layer 2 network. Members of the Uniswap Governance criticize this step as non-transparent and as a potential threat to the governance's governance. In particular, the allocation of $ 165.5 million ensures the development of Unicain and liquidity incentives for resentment among university token owners.

Dissatisfaction of the university token owner

Frustration among university token owners is great. They point out that the centralized revenue strategy from Uniswap is disadvantageous for them. In the past two years, Uniswap has taken over $ 171 million in front-end fees without the token owners being able to participate in these income. Critics emphasize that the decision of Uniswap Labs to centralize the income is, unlike other protocols such as AAVE, which offer their users a financial advantage through dividing divides. The Defi-Analyst Ignas noted that uni-owners without increasing value for their tokens are treated as a "milking cow".

In addition, the investment strategy of uniswap was questioned. Crypto commentator Duo Nine argued that the funds should better flow into return purchases from university tokens instead of investments in Unicain. He warned that the planned strategies could not be successful without rewarding the token owners.

liquidity problems and effects on the defi ecosystem

Another central concern of the community is the potential disruption of the liquidity distribution in the entire Defi ecosystem, which could be triggered by the introduction of Unicain. The Uniswap Dao has provided $ 21 million to increase the Total Value Locked (TVL) from Unicain - a project that should actually serve to attract new capital. However, there is concern that these measures not only attract new funds, but also lead to the liquidity of Ethereum and existing Layer 2 solutions.

Ignas warned that the redirection of liquidity to Unicain uniswaps could reduce influence on Ethereum and create space for competitors. This redistribution could worsen trade conditions, which could lead to higher slipping and reduced efficiency in the entire defi ecosystem.

outlook and market reactions

Despite the controversy, the Uniswap Foundation has confirmed its determination of further developing Unicain and promoting Uniswap V4. However, it remains to be seen to what extent these plans will lead to an improvement in the long -term perspectives of the protocol.

Since the launch of Unicain on February 11th, the university token has experienced fluctuating moods and price movements. In the last trading session, the price was $ 7.52, which corresponds to a modest increase of 2 % compared to the previous day.

Overall, these developments show that the uniswap community faces major challenges, while it adapts to the constantly changing landscape of the Defi market.