Suche
Mein Konto
Bitcoin Mining report shows that the emissions of the network make up 0.08 % of the global CO2-mining Bitcoin messages
Last year, Bitcoin-the cryptocurrency network that Proof-of-Work (POW) uses to process transactions and secure the protocol-received a lot of criticism about its environmental impact. This week, the cryptocurrency company Coinshares published a report that shows that the arguments that condemn the power consumption of the network were very exaggerated. According to Coinshares, the mining infrastructure of Bitcoin now accounts for 0.08 % of the global carbon dioxide (CO2) production. Despite the ESG critic, studies “Bitcoin Mining act as an energy maker and consumes less energy than the banking industry. There was a lot of disapproval from people who believe that the Bitcoin network is bad for ...
Bitcoin Mining report shows that the emissions of the network make up 0.08 % of the global CO2-mining Bitcoin messages
Last year Bitcoin-the cryptocurrency network that uses proof-of-work (POW) to process transactions and secure the protocol-received a lot of criticism about its environmental impact. This week, the cryptocurrency company Coinshares published a report that shows that the arguments that condemn the power consumption of the network were very exaggerated. According to Coinshares, the mining infrastructure of Bitcoin is now 0.08 % of global carbon dioxide (CO2) production.
Despite the ESG critic, studies “Bitcoin mining act as an energy maker and consumes less energy than the banking industry
There was a lot of disapproval from people who believe that the Bitcoin network is bad for the environment. Many have convicted Bitcoins Pow because they believe that it requires too much energy to keep the network going. Although the critics never discuss Energy consumption of the US dollars it is also through state violence forced . Critics also use data with extreme bias and inaccuracies that come from the Digiconomist website. The web portal is operated, for example, by Alex de Vries, an employee of de Nederlandsche Bank NV (DNB).
Despite the nagging critics, numerous reports have shown that Bitcoin's energy consumption is far less than with alternative financial systems. In May 2021, galaxy digital published a Learn on the energy consumption of Bitcoin mining, and it turned out that it was far less than the energy that the gold or banking industry consumes. Galaxy Digital also described how methane emissions are used by companies like Great American Mining, Upstream Data and Crusoe Energy Systems by converting wasted torch gas into usable energy. Study notes by Galaxy Digital:
Bitcoin mining is the ideal energy mate: Everyone, everywhere, can make excess energy into money by connecting devices and switching them off as desired. An example of where Bitcoin mining acts as an energy base are oil fields, which leads to a direct reduction in methane emissions.
CoinShares: 'Bitcoin will be 100 % renewable as soon as our electricity generation is 100 % renewable'
This week coinshares publishes its Bitcoin mining report , a study that, in addition to environmental, social and governance (ESG), provides the latest data on the condition of the Bitcoin mining industry. The Coinshares report estimates that the Bitcoin protocol exposed 42 megatons of CO2 in 2021.
The study emphasizes that the overall emissions of the earth in 2019 amount to 49,360 megatons CO2. In addition to the mining infrastructure of the network, which makes up 0.08 % of the global carbon dioxide, Bitcoin's energy consumption is also 0.05 % of the total of energy used worldwide. The co-shares study says:
The entire global energy consumption (not production, which is significantly higher) was estimated in 2019 to 162,194 TWH. With an annual energy consumption of 89 TWH, the Bitcoin mining network consumes about 0.05 % of the total energy used worldwide. This seems to us as a small cost factor for a global currency system and is equivalent to a rounding error in the global energy balance.
In the meantime, ESG concerns have caused numerous companies to cease Bitcoin support or to consider ceasing Bitcoin in the future. For example, the software community Mozilla To donate cryptocurrencies for reasons of "environmental impact". Tesla also Bitcoin acceptance because of its effects on the environment. According to Mozilla, the Wikimedia Foundation taken into account Crypto donations were discontinued for the same reasons, and Wikimedia members used the by Digiconomist Inaccurate on many occasions. Target = "_ blank" href = "https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-energy-cons-is-far-more- and-greener-than-todays-banking-system/" Rel = "noopener"> data deviations .
The Bitcoin mining report, which was published by Coinhares this week, shows that the ESG concerns have been very exaggerated in the past 12 months. Coinshares says that the current focus should be more on the production of renewable energy resources instead of attacking monetary innovation that has insignificant emission rate and insignificant energy consumption.
"Although it is clear that emissions are currently being created by Bitcoin mining, these emissions are not only insignificant on a global scale, but in no way necessary in any way," concludes the co-shares report. "Bitcoin will be 100 % renewable as soon as our electricity generation is 100 % renewable. Our focus should not be on the expansion of renewable electricity generation, not to prevent the development of monetary technologies."
What do you think of the report published by Coinshares, which shows that the emissions of the Bitcoin network today only make up about 0.08 % of global carbon dioxide production? Share your opinion on this topic in the comment area below.
Bedy verification : Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wikicommons