Bitcoin: Historical 4-year cycle, despite the institutional adoption, remains intact-glass node analysis refutes the theory of 'cyclustod'

Bitcoin: Historical 4-year cycle, despite the institutional adoption, remains intact-glass node analysis refutes the theory of 'cyclustod'

Bitcoin’s historical 4-year cycle: Is he still intact despite the institutional takeover?

In the world of cryptocurrencies, the cycles that go through Bitcoin are often talked about. A central point in this discussion is the historic 4-year cycle, which results from the Halving event, in which the reward for the mining of Bitcoin is halved. These events took place in the past in 2012, 2016 and 2020 and had significant effects on the Bitcoin price.

A current analysis of Glassnode questions the theory of "cyclust death", which says that Bitcoin's market cycles could have changed in the light of the increasing institutional adoption. According to this analysis, various on-chain data show that the 4-year cycle may continue to exist, despite the remarkable developments in the institutional area.

The assertion that institutional investors change nature and dynamics of Bitcoin could possibly be exaggerated. Glassnode emphasizes that historical patterns and key figures from the past still have validity and offer a valuable basis for the analysis of the Bitcoin market.

The analysis shows that Bitcoin continues to go through strong price movements that correlate with the halving cycles. This indicates that the 4-year cycle, despite the new participants in the market, still plays a significant role. It remains to be seen whether and how the market will develop, but the existing structure of the Bitcoin market should not be underestimated.

In summary, it can be said that the discussion about the condition and future of the Bitcoin market is still of great relevance. Glassnode's findings could help expand understanding of the suspected and actual cycles and to make long -term investment decisions on a solid basis.