A car crashed into the barricade of the current SBF house, said lawyers

A car crashed into the barricade of the current SBF house, said lawyers

The lawyers of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) describe that three men drove their vehicle into a metal barricade in front of his parents' house in California.

The family of the former CEO of FTX recently admitted that the goal of "intensive media observation, harassment" and even physical threats.

The safety incident

The gigantic crash of ftx caused in billions in billions and made SBF one of the most notorious figures in Cryptocurrency room. The US authorities accuses The 30-year-old, the main ludiculer to be behind the collapse and to have committed several crimes such as money laundering and fraud.

Something expected spread the wave of criticism among affected investors, many of which also blame him for the event.

His lawyers recently revealed that three people have been driven against the barricade of his current house and told a security officer have:

"You will not be able to stop us."

Then they got back into the vehicle and drove away undetected. The man who guarded the house in Palo Alto could not write down the number of the car.

The incident occurred almost a month after a New York federal judge allowed SBF lives with a record bond of $ 250 million in the house of his parents. Previously, he spent a week in Fox Hill prison in Baham, while the trial on October 2, 2023 will decide whether to play a role in the downfall of FTX and will decide on his final judgment.

The lawyers disclosed early this month that his mother-and his father-Joseph Bankman-had received a steady stream of threatening correspondence, Including communications in which the wish is expressed that they suffer physical damage ”.

Who allowed the bond?

The 250 million dollar bond, which made it possible to wait for SBF in his parents' house, triggered considerable controversy in the crypto community. As such, leading media, including Bloomberg, CNBC, The Financial Times, The Washington Post and other, urged to reveal the names of the people who have.

The lawyers from SBF refused to give details of the request, and explained that there was a high probability that these guarantees are exposed to similar nuisance as Ms. Fried and Mr. Bankman should become public:

"In view of the awareness of this case and the extraordinary attention of the media, which is given to him, it can be assumed that the guarantors that are not the parents are confronted with considerable data protection and security concerns when their identity is disclosed."

The prosecutors have not yet taken any steps to comply with the complaint of the media.

.