British advisor demands regulation because AI could threaten humanity in two years

Da künstliche Intelligenz (KI) immer wieder Durchbrüche in den Möglichkeiten erzielt, wächst die Sorge, ob diese Innovationen möglicherweise leistungsfähiger werden als ihre Schöpfer. Matt Clifford, Vorsitzender der britischen Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA), betonte dies kürzlich in einem Interview mit einer lokalen Nachrichtenagentur. KI muss innerhalb von zwei Jahren reguliert werden Clifford betonte, dass KI bald reguliert werden müsse, um das Risiko einzudämmen, innerhalb der nächsten zwei Jahre „sehr mächtig“ zu werden, da der Mensch derzeit keine Kontrolle über sie habe. „Wir haben zwei Jahre Zeit, um einen Rahmen zu schaffen, der sowohl die Kontrolle als auch die Regulierung …
Since artificial intelligence (AI) repeatedly achieves breakthroughs in the possibilities, concern is growing as to whether these innovations may become more efficient than their creators. Matt Clifford, chairman of the British Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), recently emphasized this in an interview with a local news agency. AI must be regulated within two years, Clifford emphasized that AI would soon have to be regulated in order to contain the risk of becoming "very powerful" within the next two years, since people currently have no control over them. “We have two years to create a framework that both control and regulation ... (Symbolbild/KNAT)

British advisor demands regulation because AI could threaten humanity in two years

Since artificial intelligence (AI) repeatedly achieves breakthroughs in the possibilities, concern is growing as to whether these innovations may become more efficient than their creators.

Matt Clifford, chairman of the British Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), recently emphasized this in an interview with a local news agency.

AI must be regulated within two years

Clifford emphasized that KI would soon have to be regulated to contain the risk of becoming “very powerful” within the next two years, since man currently has no control over them.

"We have two years to create a framework that makes both control and regulation of these very large models much easier than today," he said.

Clifford commented on the short-term and long-term risks that can result from the use of AI tools, and said people could use AI-generated information to produce biowapen or carry out cyber attacks.

Clifford is not the only technology expert who worries about the risks associated with AI growth. In an open letter from the Center for Ai Safety, 350 experts in artificial intelligence advocated the idea of ​​treating AI as an existential threat, such as nuclear weapons and pandemics threaten human existence.

Can AI represent a greater threat to humanity?

The computer scientist and former Google employee Geoffrey Hinton also has the idea that AI could withdraw power to people. At the beginning of the month, he mentioned in an interview that people build intelligence who exceed mankind and a threat to our existence.

Hinton, which is considered one of the sponsors of the AI, emphasized the efficiency and skills of digital intelligence to exchange knowledge compared to the restrictions on biological intelligence. Hinton admitted that AI has potential advantages, but emphasized the need to mitigate and prevent the associated negative consequences.

.